Am I the only one who finds statements like "Dear Init-Freedom lovers, the Veteran Unix Admin collective salutes you!" a real turn-off? All right, it may just be my cynical personality, but I distrust people who keep calling themselves the Veteran Unix Admins.
We plan to innovate many of the tools that were historically used in Debian development, still mainaining stable, testing and unstable package repositories that users and downstream can use.
That means forking the entire Debian project. Delusions of grandeur.
Once installed and updated this package avoids the requirement of systemd as PID 1 and adopts systemd-shim when strictly needed.
So their grand plan is to use systemd-shim? How long will it take the cabal to eliminate that "loophole"?
Its priority is to enable diversity, interoperability and backward compatibility for existing Debian users and downstream distributions willing to preserve Init freedom.
Considering upstream developers are moving toward systemd dependency, because almost all Linux systems will soon be using it, how do they plan to keep those applications in their repositories? Freeze development at the Wheezy stage or modify every package?
They are still aiming to high. Their goal is to create a full Debian distribution with Stable, Testing and Unstable branches without systemd. Too much and unrealistic. The only way the project would be feasible is to have a small system that does not depend on Debian. But good luck to them.
Klingons are fun, but Romulans are the sexiest women in the galaxy.