cynwulf wrote:I do believe you're spamming...?
I have some questions:
1) Who are the secret "collective" of forum admins and why the secrecy? (Sounds fishy to me, push for more transparency, maybe a democratic forum........)
cynwulf wrote:2) Who is funding it / paying the bills?
cynwulf wrote:3) As you're one of the moderators, does that mean the users who disagree with you simply get banned?
cynwulf wrote:4) If someone were to create an account and start posting about how good systemd is, what would be the response from the secret admin collective / moderators?![]()
cynwulf wrote:5) Would a linuxquestions.org distro subsection not have sufficed? Better exposure surely:
https://www.linuxquestions.org/question ... ro-513876/
nauved wrote:me, fsmithred and a few others (not known here) are in the mix. We are not chest-thumpers. But if you'd looked at the list of who registered when, you could have figured it out for yourself.
nauved wrote:Me
nauved wrote:Just the spammers who are already at our door. BTW . . . also an admin.
nauved wrote:We'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
nauved wrote:No. Devuan is a world unto itself.Besides, I've rarely even gone to that site. It's never felt 'right' to me.
nauved wrote:Thanks for the kind supportive words (as always). LOL!
cynwulf wrote:Well it seems that said content was found to be objectionable, for one person anyway?
cynwulf wrote:Ah, fun times are ahead for you...
cynwulf wrote:Personally I would never seriously administer a forum again. I "help out" here, but johndeere is the admin/owner, that's pretty much it. pick2, much to his credit, does and has done for years, most of the spam removal, etc. But really we're just a "ghost town" here and there probably isn't much point continuing next year (as there wasn't the year before, or before that, or.....).
cynwulf wrote:I mentioned a linuxquestions subform, because it will give the exposure to the project and someone else will handle all of the tedious administration/moderation bollocks. Personally I don't think it's down to personal likes/dislikes of LQ and how it does things, it's more about 'what is best for the Devuan project' and that's probably to have an LQ section.
nauved wrote:'this is not a therapy or support group for emotions/ feelings . . . Grow up!'
nauved wrote:It is proving to be quite time consuming.
nauved wrote:For me the only point of this forum is the history and the people who rebelled against changes that signaled the beginning of the end of Debian as we knew it.
nauved wrote:Well, we're committed now. We'll either swim or sink.
Cute.The officially unofficial Devuan Forum!
You could do both. From what I remember, having a section on LQ only requires a project developer to be available to answer questions.nauved wrote:cynwulf wrote:I mentioned a linuxquestions subform, because it will give the exposure to the project and someone else will handle all of the tedious administration/moderation bollocks. Personally I don't think it's down to personal likes/dislikes of LQ and how it does things, it's more about 'what is best for the Devuan project' and that's probably to have an LQ section.
Well, we're committed now. We'll either swim or sink.
Users browsing this forum: Yandex [Bot] and 0 guests