[Solved]ceni and ifupdown to be removed

by **craigevil** » May 14th, 2012, 4:55 am

Do not d-u today as ceni and ifupdown would be removed. The problem is the new version of netbase.

netbase : Breaks: ifupdown (< 0.7~rc1) but 0.7~alpha5+really0.6.16 is installed.

Code: Select all: The following packages will be REMOVED: ceni ifupdown The following packages will be upgraded: dctrl-tools debhelper emacsen-common kmod libc-ares2 libio-socket-ssl-perl libkmod2 libmpg123-0 libmsn0.3 module-init-tools netbase 11 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

Code: Select all: aptitude full-upgrade -s The following packages will be upgraded: bash-completion dctrl-tools debhelper emacsen-common initscripts kmod libc-ares2 libio-socket-ssl-perl libkmod2 libmpg123-0 libmsn0.3 module-init-tools netbase{b} sysv-rc sysvinit sysvinit-utils The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT be installed: libio-socket-inet6-perl 16 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/2,150 kB of archives. After unpacking 474 kB will be freed. The following packages have unmet dependencies: netbase : Breaks: ifupdown (< 0.7~rc1) but 0.7~alpha5+really0.6.16 is installed. The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Remove the following packages: 1) ceni 2) ifupdown Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] q

by **lester]** » May 14th, 2012, 5:22 am

here is what I get

aptitude wrote: aptitude full-upgrade -s
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libgegl-0.2-0{a} libpam-cap{a} libumfpack5.4.0{a}
The following packages will be REMOVED:
libgegl-0.1-0{u}
The following packages will be upgraded:
blender dctrl-tools debhelper debian-archive-keyring gimp gimp-data grep kmod libcap2 libcap2-bin libgimp2.0 libio-socket-ssl-perl libkmod2 libmpg123-0 libpulse-mainloop-glib0 libpulse0 libqtwebkit4
libtiff-tools libtiff5 linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-686-pae linux-libc-dev module-init-tools netbase{b}
24 packages upgraded, 3 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 104 MB of archives. After unpacking 8,665 kB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
netbase : Breaks: ifupdown (< 0.7~rc1) but 0.7~beta2 is installed.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

Remove the following packages:
1) ifupdown

Leave the following dependencies unresolved:
2) netbase recommends ifupdown

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] q
Abandoning all efforts to resolve these dependencies.
Abort.

Holding netbase resolves the ifupdown issue on my box

aptitude wrote:# aptitude hold netbase
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 24 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.

# aptitude full-upgrade -s
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libgegl-0.2-0{a} libpam-cap{a} libumfpack5.4.0{a}
The following packages will be REMOVED:
libgegl-0.1-0{u}
The following packages will be upgraded:
blender dctrl-tools debhelper debian-archive-keyring gimp gimp-data grep kmod libcap2 libcap2-bin libgimp2.0 libio-socket-ssl-perl libkmod2 libmpg123-0 libpulse-mainloop-glib0 libpulse0 libqtwebkit4
libtiff-tools libtiff5 linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-686-pae linux-libc-dev module-init-tools
23 packages upgraded, 3 newly installed, 1 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 104 MB of archives. After unpacking 8,672 kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
Would download/install/remove packages.

by **craigevil** » May 14th, 2012, 6:24 am

Yeah I went ahead and put netbase on hold.

10 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.

by **nadir** » May 14th, 2012, 11:59 am

Thanks. I bet anything i got i would have missed it.

apt-get upgrade
instead of dist-upgrade seems to work too. Well: here.

by **cynwulf** » May 14th, 2012, 1:25 pm

nadir wrote:Thanks. I bet anything i got i would have missed it.

apt-get upgrade
instead of dist-upgrade seems to work too. Well: here.

I'm not sure about apt-get, but aptitude uses a safe resolver when you use the "safe-upgrade" argument as opposed to "full-upgrade".

by **Beewolf** » May 14th, 2012, 4:27 pm

"safe-upgrade" is just a misleading and needlessly verbose synonym for "upgrade". The one difference between apt-get and aptitude in that command is that the former will only upgrade packages and won't install or remove any while the latter will install packages if necessary.

by **lester]** » May 14th, 2012, 5:31 pm

I ran 4 simple simulations
pick your poison.

More: show

I think they both work pretty damn OK
I must be in Love.

by **craigevil** » May 16th, 2012, 12:02 am

Update of ifupdown in sid yesterday fixed the issue.

$ apt-cache policy ifupdown
ifupdown:
Installed: 0.7~rc3
Candidate: 0.7~rc3
Version table:
*** 0.7~rc3 0
500 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ unstable/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
0.7~rc2+experimental 0
1 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ experimental/main i386 Packages

$ apt-cache policy netbase
netbase:
Installed: 5.0
Candidate: 5.0
Version table:
*** 5.0 0
500 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ unstable/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

[Solved]ceni and ifupdown to be removed

[Solved]ceni and ifupdown to be removed

Re: ceni and ifupdown to be removed

Re: ceni and ifupdown to be removed

Re: ceni and ifupdown to be removed

Re: ceni and ifupdown to be removed

Re: ceni and ifupdown to be removed

Re: ceni and ifupdown to be removed

Re: ceni and ifupdown to be removed

Who is online