Memory usage in different window managers

Talk about anything you feel like talking about. Pull up a soapbox and pontificate to your heart's content. May contain some adult humour or otherwise objectionable content (NSFW). No warez, pr0n or illegal stuff.

Memory usage in different window managers

Postby Lou » February 9th, 2015, 4:45 pm

Debian Jessie w/o systemd - icewm
User avatar
Lou
 
Posts: 235
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 3:58 pm

Re: Memory usage in different window managers

Postby mean_dean » February 9th, 2015, 8:21 pm

I try others over and over again but always end up back on icewm...

The original icewm project even seems to be abandoned nowadays, which is usually the kick I need to move on, but havent found anything I like better.
User avatar
mean_dean
 
Posts: 192
Joined: November 30th, 2014, 1:12 pm

Re: Memory usage in different window managers

Postby bmc5311 » February 9th, 2015, 11:25 pm

I just stick with openbox, it easy and simple - like me.
MacBook Air / stable amd64 / openbox
2006 mac mini / stable / openbox
User avatar
bmc5311
 
Posts: 487
Joined: February 12th, 2011, 1:07 am
Location: lost in the vast machine

Re: Memory usage in different window managers

Postby Randicus Draco Albus » February 9th, 2015, 11:37 pm

I fired up the proxy service to look at the WordPress article and was rather disappointed. The article is little more than a list of the most-used WMs with the earth-shattering news that WMs use less memory than DEs. I got the impression the writer's purpose is to inform Ubuntu users that there is more available than just Unity. This Wm uses 3MB of memory, while that WM uses 3 1/2 and that one uses 5MB. I do not find such comparisons very useful. Hardware that can run Openbox can also run Awesome, i3 and IceWM.
Klingons are fun, but Romulans are the sexiest women in the galaxy.
User avatar
Randicus Draco Albus
 
Posts: 1497
Joined: September 22nd, 2011, 1:22 pm

Re: Memory usage in different window managers

Postby mean_dean » February 9th, 2015, 11:44 pm

bmc5311 wrote:I just stick with openbox, it easy and simple - like me.

xml makes my brain explode

seriously though I dont understand the purpose of xml config files
User avatar
mean_dean
 
Posts: 192
Joined: November 30th, 2014, 1:12 pm

Re: Memory usage in different window managers

Postby cynwulf » February 10th, 2015, 9:13 am

xml is supposed to be both human readable (right...) and machine readable. It's for GUI based configuration editors, which openbox provides (obconf, obmenu, etc). It's not a huge leap from that to binary config. gnome's config is a good example of this - rather than trawling through six directories deep of xml configuration, while struggling with poor or non-existent documentation - it's easier to just nuke a few of the dot directories and start again...

I prefer fluxbox - it has a panel - and it has human readable plain text configuration. You can literally just open ~/.fluxbox/menu and just bang in whatever you want in your menu and done.

In the article he lists openbox as blackbox derived, which isn't true. Early versions were forked from blackbox, but later on it was completely rebuilt/reimplemented in C and is GPL licenced (fluxbox and blackbox are coded in C++ and MIT licenced).
cynwulf
 
Posts: 2548
Joined: April 26th, 2011, 2:46 pm

Re: Memory usage in different window managers

Postby mean_dean » February 10th, 2015, 4:44 pm

Yea I prefer plain text configs too. Of course xml isn't as bad as I make it out to be, but I gotta have some fun somehow. But yea I guess the structure makes sense for gui tools to parse and the benefit is that it can be human readable and tweakable too.
User avatar
mean_dean
 
Posts: 192
Joined: November 30th, 2014, 1:12 pm

Re: Memory usage in different window managers

Postby Lou » February 10th, 2015, 6:46 pm

mean_dean wrote:I try others over and over again but always end up back on icewm...


Ditto here. Lately, i alternate btwn icewm and jwm every other month.

I'm not much of a menu/click and point guy, my choice is keybinds and use the Fn keys to launch everything, even to restart the wm.
Gnome/KDE/Ubuntu are out in my book.
Debian Jessie w/o systemd - icewm
User avatar
Lou
 
Posts: 235
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 3:58 pm

Re: Memory usage in different window managers

Postby mean_dean » February 10th, 2015, 7:46 pm

cynwulf wrote:You can literally just open ~/.fluxbox/menu and just bang in whatever you want in your menu and done.
argh the brackets and curlys are everywhere :D
thank goodness for copy/paste, didnt take but a minute to turn my icewm menu into fluxbox menu

Code: Select all
prog "iceweasel"        xxx.png         iceweasel
prog "mirage"           xxx.png         mirage
prog "writer"           xxx.png         soffice --writer
prog "calc"             xxx.png         soffice --calc
prog "lxterminal"       xxx.png         lxterminal
prog "gimp"             xxx.png         gimp
prog "pcmanfm"          xxx.png         pcmanfm
prog "geany"            xxx.png         geany
prog "run"              xxx.png         gmrun
menu "mplayer"          xxx.png         {
prog "rock70s"          xxx.png         xterm -e "mplayer /home/user/music/rock70s/*"
prog "rock80s"          xxx.png         xterm -e "mplayer /home/user/music/rock80s/*"
prog "recent"           xxx.png         xterm -e "mplayer /home/user/music/recent/*"
}

Code: Select all
[begin] (fluxbox)
[exec] (run) {gmrun} <>
[exec] (writer) {soffice --writer} <>
[exec] (calc) {soffice --calc} <>
[exec] (pcmanfm) {pcmanfm} <>
[exec] (iceweasel) {iceweasel} <>
[exec] (mirage) {mirage} <>
[exec] (lxterminal) {lxterminal} <>
[exec] (gimp) {gimp} <>
[exec] (geany) {geany} <>
[submenu] (mplayer) {}
[exec] (rock70s) {xterm -e "mplayer /home/user/music/rock70s/*"} <>
[exec] (rock80s) {xterm -e "mplayer /home/user/music/rock80s/*"} <>
[exec] (recent) {xterm -e "mplayer /home/user/music/recent/*"} <>
[end]
[restart] (Restart)
[exit] (Exit)
[end]
User avatar
mean_dean
 
Posts: 192
Joined: November 30th, 2014, 1:12 pm

Re: Memory usage in different window managers

Postby mean_dean » February 10th, 2015, 7:53 pm

Lou wrote:Ditto here. Lately, i alternate btwn icewm and jwm every other month.

I usually end up running into some niggle with jwm...cant recall any specifically now tho...will have to try it again...

I'm not much of a menu/click and point guy, my choice is keybinds

I am okay with a menu if my apps are listed without any nesting. That and a good run utility mapped to alt+f2 is my usual method.
User avatar
mean_dean
 
Posts: 192
Joined: November 30th, 2014, 1:12 pm

Next

Return to Nonsense

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

x